![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjE3LOHWxgyNHUKEtrnfWGOyhvLB4aTSpV8pYKQ_kBSAfug6UY63QHn3pVl2eKtcC5R8uulBV3yk7yN7_RKD0RFUGvdHqBbv3FdHdflkHbnD3UTnIVNxyygNk7vqYJ-pp15w8ZmFDTzuFA/s320/285196_2079046990135_1663853736_1999699_6152096_n.jpg)
I too am a storm brewing. Have been working on a poetry project that has made me think seriously about content. What makes a subject significant? If the poem is engaged in observation, how can you be sure that the content is more than a mere report? What gives the observation consequence? Can the consequence be subtle, rather than shaped by certain edginess? Who's paying attention to what's "worth it"? I think having a project makes me think deeply about my writer's craft. I enjoy the routine of a project. I look forward to each day's new work. Stunned by my constant fussing over the "small world" poems I've written, whereas the longer lyric-narratives and other forms (cinquain, triolet, pantoum and so on) have been holding up. I've been enjoying the process. It's a conversation that is allowed to travel through the past,present, future zones. I think the conversation is wrestling with memory-- it's vulnerable; it wants a cure. We'll see . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment